COMMUNITY CHARTER
This section tries to provide the latest information available about
the proposed community charter. This is not an easy task, as the charter has been largely
discussed in secret, and so far there has not been any significant consultation on even the most
fundamental level with those people which it proposes to govern. This sets
the scene for confrontations between those who currently govern
at the municipal level and those who are being governed. Make no mistake - this
charter will change our lives.
.
The following is a list of references on the Draft Community Charter. Any additions would be most
welcome!
Media Articles
-
Penticton Western - March 30/2002 - particularly note:
- Removal of accountability by counter-petitions.
- Establishing annual "performance" reviews but without any teeth.
- Removing "Campaign Contributions" as a potential conflict of interest.
- Allowing councils to "overide bylaws"
- Allowing more borrowing/debt without public consultation.
Letters
Definition of key terms used in Community Charter
-
Approval of the electors:
"Electors approvals may generally be provided by electors assent (a vote) OR
by alternative elector approval process (opportunity for electors to seek a vote).
The Threshold number of electors who must respond seeking a vote under
alternative elector approval process is 10%"
So what does this mean? It means that if council does not select to use
a referendum to get approval of the electors it could use the so called
`negative billing approach'. If no more than about 5000 signatures (a huge
number to obtain in the alloted 30 days) are obtained requesting a referendum
then the council initiative (such as undedicating a park) passes. The Local Government
Act currently requires only 5% of the electors (~2500 for the District) to
trigger a referendum vote. Thus, by simply redefining "approval of the electors"
the Community Charter has substantially weakened council accountability.
This page maintained by Corrie Kost
Last modified26-Nov-2005